Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Leitch

82 N.C. 539

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1880-01-05
Topic
general

Dillard, J. This was an indictment for murder, andón the appeal of the prisoner to this court, there being no statement of the case, it is our duty to look through the record to see if there be any error therein. We have carefully examined the whole record and are unable to detect any error entitling the prisoner to a new trial or arrest of judgment, and in such case we can only have certified our opinion to the court below that the court may proceed to judgment. State v. Ray, 10 Ired., 29; State v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Leitch. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
STATEv. LEITCH,82 N.C. 539(1880)
fn*STATE v. PETER LEITCH.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(January Term, 1880.)
Appeal — Practice.

Where, on an appeal in a capital case, there is no statement of the case, and no error appears on the record, it will be certified to the court below that there is no error, so that it may proceed to judgment.

(State v. Ray, 10 Ired., 29;State v. Langford, Busb., 436;State v.Murray,80 N.C. 364, cited and approved.)
INDICTMENT for Murder tried at Fall Term, 1879, of ROBESON Superior Court, beforeSeymour, J.
Judgment was pronounced upon conviction of the prisoner, and he appealed to this court.
Attorney General, for the State.

No counsel for prisoner.
DILLARD, J.
This was an indictment for murder, and on the appeal of the prisoner to this court, there being no statement of the case, it is our duty to look through the record to see if there be any error therein.

We have carefully examined the whole record and are unable to detect any error entitling the prisoner to a new trial or arrest of judgment, and in such case we can only have certified our opinion to the court below that the court may proceed to judgment.State v. Ray, 10 Ired., 29;State v.Langford, Busb., 436;State v. Murray,80 N.C. 364.

There is no error and this will be certified to the court belowPage 540that the sentence of the law may be pronounced and executed.

PER CURIAM. No error.
  1. The judge who presided on the trial of this case (after hearing an appeal was taken) informs the Reporter, by letter, that no bond or affidavit, c., was filed during the term, and no appeal then perfected; and no exception was made to the ruling of the court on evidence or to its charge to the jury. ↩