Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. . Keesler
78 N.C. 469
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1878-01-05
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- dismissing indictment for defendant’s improper intercourse with his daughter as not contrary to any statutory offense and unindictable under the common law
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Keesler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
STATEv. KEESLER,78 N.C. 469(1878)
STATE v. JAMES KEESLER.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(January Term, 1878.)
Incest is not an indictable offense in this State.
The defendant was charged with having had an improper intercourse with his own daughter, and was found guilty by the jury, and upon motion of the defendant's counsel, his Honor arrested the judgment upon the ground that the bill of indictment did not charge a criminal offense, and Tate, solicitor for the State, appealed.
In most of the States of the Union incest is made an indictable (470) offense by statute. Perhaps its rare occurrence in this State has caused the revolting crime to pass unnoticed by the Legislature.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed.Cited: S. v. Laurence,95 N.C. 660;S. v. Cutshall,109 N.C. 774.
NOTE. — This was cured by chapter 16, Laws 1879, now Revisal, 3351, 3352.