Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Huff
327 N.C. 475
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1990-10-03
- Topic
- bankruptcy
ORDER UPON consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court and remanding this cause, for further consideration in light of its decision in McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. ---, 108 L.Ed.2d 369 (1990), the following order is entered: Defendant shall have up to and including 5 November 1990 to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to McKoy and, if so, whether any such error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. McKoy, 327 N.C. 31 (26 July 1990). The State may file its brief in response within 30 days after service of defendant’s brief upon it.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Huff. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
ORDER
UPON consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court and remanding this cause, for further consideration in light of its decision in McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. ---, 108 L.Ed.2d 369 (1990), the following order is entered:
Defendant shall have up to and including 5 November 1990 to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to McKoy and, if so, whether any such error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. McKoy, 327 N.C. 31 (26 July 1990). The State may file its brief in response within 30 days after service of defendant’s brief upon it. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of October 1990.Whichard, J.
For the Court