Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Carpenter

193 N.C. 848

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1927-05-04
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The defendant’s exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious “blind tiger” could not have availed the defendant. . S. v. Lane, 166 N.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Carpenter. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious “blind tiger” could not have availed the defendant. . S. v. Lane, 166 N. C., 333. There was evidence that the defendant’s admission was voluntary, and for this reason the third and fifth exceptions are untenable. The instruction as to the defendant’s possession'of the liquor is sustained by S. v. McAllister, 187 N. C., 400. The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.

No error.