Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. . Burgess
226 N.C. 771
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1946-10-30
- Topic
- general
Pee Cubiam. The defendant, appellant, noted exception to the judge’s charge to the jury in respect to the definition of what was necessary to be shown to constitute assault with intent to commit rape. An examination of the language used by the court leads to the conclusion that the instructions given were in substantial accord with the definition approved by numerous decisions of this Court. S. v. Massey, 86 N.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Burgess. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The defendant, appellant, noted exception to the judge’s charge to the jury in respect to the definition of what was necessary to be shown to constitute assault with intent to commit rape. An examination of the language used by the court leads to the conclusion that the instructions given were in substantial accord with the definition approved by numerous decisions of this Court. S. v. Massey, 86 N. C., 658; S. v. Jeffreys, 117 N. C., 743, 23 S. E., 175; S. v. Jones, 222 N. C., 37, 21 S. E. (2d), 812; S. v. Walsh, 224 N. C., 218, 29 S. E. (2d), 743; S. v. Gay, 224 N. C., 141, 29 S. E. (2d), 458.
The State’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to warrant the verdict. In the trial we find
No error.