Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Baker

65 N.C. 332

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1871-01-05
Topic
bankruptcy

Reads, J. The defendant went up to the prosecutor and said, “ I once thought we were Mends, but I understand you have said thus and so about me, and you have got to take it back.” The prosecutor refused to take it back, “whereupon the defendant put his hand, open and flat, on the prosecutor’s breast and pushed him back some steps,, when he fell over a flour barrel.” *333 At first sight this seems to be so indisputably an assault and battery, that, lest it be supposed that the defendant is encumbering the Court with trifles, it is necessary to state the ingenious shifts of his learned counsel in presenting his 'case. I. {£ It was at a country store where politeness is not a commodity.” Suppose this to be so, and make full allowance for country manners, still, there may be “ rudeness ” at a country store ; and if this was not, then rudeness cannot he. II. u The hand was open.” So it would have been if he had slapped his face. EEI. u Whether it was £ rudeness ’ was a question for the jury — putting the hand on being an equivocal act and might have been friendly.” Suppose the facts testified to had been embodied in a .special verdict, would it not have been for the Court to say whether they made a case of guilty ?

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Baker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions