Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Balt. Mining Co., 101 N.C. 679 (N.C. 1888)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1888-09-05
Topic
general

Smith, C. J. This appeal has been retained for several terms under an adversari, while the subject matter has been fully considered in the opinion heretofore delivered in the decision of the defendant’s appeal. Silver Valley Co. v. Baltimore Co., 99 N.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Smith, C. J.

This appeal has been retained for several terms under an adversari, while the subject matter has been fully considered in the opinion heretofore delivered in the decision of the defendant’s appeal. Silver Valley Co. v. Baltimore Co., 99 N. C., 445. After due consideration, and in view of what is there said, our conclusion is that no error is disclosed in the ruling from which the present appeal is taken, and therefore we affirm, the .judgment.

Affirmed.