Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Royal v. Armstrong

Royal v. Armstrong, 351 N.C. 474 (N.C. 2000)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
2000-04-06
Topic
general

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 2000. Justices Orr and Martin recused.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Royal v. Armstrong. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 2000.

Justices Orr and Martin recused.