Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Lovelace v. Shelby
352 N.C. 157
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2000-06-15
- Topic
- estate-planning
How later courts describe this case
- refusing to extend the public duty doctrine to shield a city from liability for the allegedly negligent acts of a 911 operator
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lovelace v. Shelby. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
544 S.E.2d 225 (2000) 352 N.C. 157
Sharon Lynn LOVELACE, Administratix of the Estate of Shayla Meagen Moore, and Sharon Lynn Lovelace, Individually
No. 312A99.
Sharon Lynn LOVELACE, Administratix of the Estate of Shayla Meagen Moore, and Sharon Lynn Lovelace, Individually
v.
CITY OF SHELBY and
Thomas Lowell Lee.
No. 312A99.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 15, 2000.W. Robinson Deaton, Jr., Shelby, Fred A. Flowers, for Lovelace.
Martha Raymond Thompson, Charles A. Horn, Shelby, for Shelby.
Stella A. Boswell, Durham, for N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers.
Prior report: 351 N.C. 458, 526 S.E.2d 652.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of June 2000."