Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re T.K.

360 N.C. 163

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Date: 2005-12-16
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re T.K.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

IN RE T.K.,360 N.C. 163(2005)

IN THE MATTER OF T.K., D.K., T.K., AND J.K.

No. 386A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,___ N.C. App. ___,613 S.E.2d 739(2005), affirming a permanency planning order entered 31 October 2003 by Judge Lisa C. Bell in District Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 December 2005.

Tyrone C. Wade, Associate County Attorney, forpetitioner-appellee Mecklenburg County Department of SocialServices.Michael E. Casterline for respondent-appellant mother.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.Page 164