Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re E.X.J.

363 N.C. 9

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Date: 2009-02-06
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Justice BRADY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re E.X.J.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 12 opinions

IN RE E.X.J.,363 N.C. 9(2009)

IN THE MATTER OF E.X.J. AND A.J.J., MINOR CHILDREN.

No. 341A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed 6 February 2009.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,191 N.C. App. ___,662 S.E.2d 24(2008), affirming a judgment and order entered 31 July 2007 by Judge Laura A. Powell in District Court, Rutherford County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 November 2008.

Goldsmith, Goldsmith Dews, P.A., by James W. Goldsmith, forpetitioner-appellee Rutherford County Department of Social Services.Pamela Newell Williams for appellee Guardian ad Litem.Susan J. Hall for respondent-appellant father.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice BRADY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.Page 10