Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Ellison v. Ramos
349 N.C. 356
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1998-11-05
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- stating that to assume standing in a child custody dispute, a third party must have a relationship sufficient to show that the third party is not a stranger to the child
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ellison v. Ramos. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
Yvonne ELLISON
v.
Luis RAMOS.
No. 397P98.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 5, 1998.James R. Glover, Chapel Hill, Karen Davidson, for Ramos.
*892 R. Terrell Milner, Chapel Hill, for Ellison.
Prior report: 130 N.C.App. 389, 502 S.E.2d 891.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is
"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of November 1998."
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of November 1998."