Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care
Edmonds v. Fresenius Med. Care, 359 N.C. 313 (N.C. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2005-03-04
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
608 S.E.2d 755 (2005) 359 N.C. 313 Elizabeth EDMONDS, Employee v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE, Employer, Self-Insured (CNA Claim Plus, Servicing Agent). No. 487A04. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 4, 2005.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Elizabeth EDMONDS, Employee
v.
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE, Employer, Self-Insured (CNA Claim Plus, Servicing Agent).
No. 487A04.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
March 4, 2005.Randy D. Duncan, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.
Hedrick Eatman Gardner & Kincheloe, L.L.P., by Mel J. Garofalo and Shannon P. Herndon, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant Fresenius Medical Care.
*756 PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.