Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Culpepper v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley
Culpepper v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, 325 N.C. 702 (N.C. 1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1989-12-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- cocktail waitress’ employment placed her at increased risk of sexual assault not shared by general public
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Culpepper v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
386 S.E.2d 174 (1989) 325 N.C. 702
Deborah Pharr CULPEPPER, Employee, Plaintiff,
No. 194A89.
Deborah Pharr CULPEPPER, Employee, Plaintiff,
v.
FAIRFIELD SAPPHIRE VALLEY, Employer, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Carrier, Defendant.
No. 194A89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
December 7, 1989.Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston by Max E. Justice and William L. Brown, Charlotte, and Ball, Kelley, Barden & Arrowood, P.A., by Phillip G. Kelley, Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.
Russell & King, P.A. by J. William Russell and Sandra M. King, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.