Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Clark v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
316 N.C. 375
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1986-04-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- contentions not raised at trial may not be raised for the first time on appeal
- indicating claims, including “tortious concealment” of defect, would be barred
- applying the statute to defective automobile claim
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clark v. Burlington Industries, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 18 opinions
342 S.E.2d 892 (1986) 316 N.C. 375
Reece CLARK, Employee,
No. 121P86.
Reece CLARK, Employee,
v.
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, Employer, and
American Motorist Insurance Company.
No. 121P86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
April 7, 1986.Smith, Helms, Mulliss & Moore, Greensboro, for defendants.
Lore & McClearen, Raleigh, for plaintiff.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of April 1986."