Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Brittain v. . Payne

118 N.C. 989

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1896-02-05
Topic
general

Clark, J.: Where property is tortiously taken and sold, the owner may waive the tort and maintain an action to recover the money realized from the sale by the defendant. Lumber Co. v. Brooks, 109 N. C., 698; Wall v. Williams, 91 N.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brittain v. . Payne. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions
Clark, J.:

Where property is tortiously taken and sold, the owner may waive the tort and maintain an action to recover the money realized from the sale by the defendant. Lumber Co. v. Brooks, 109 N. C., 698; Wall v. Williams, 91 N. C., 477. And this is clearly what the plaintiff did by his complaint in this case. Every intendment being in favor of jurisdiction, if the complaint could have been construed as being either for the tort or to recover the money received by the defendant, this being an action before the justice, the Court would construe it to be an action on the implied contract in favor of the jurisdiction. Lewis v. Railroad, 95 N. C., 179; Stokes v. Taylor, 104 N. C., 394; Fulps v. Mock, 108 N. C., 601.

Error.