Opinion · Supreme Court of Missouri
In Re Adoption of Sypolt
In Re Adoption of Sypolt, 237 S.W.2d 193 (Mo. 1951)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Missouri
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri
- Date
- 1951-03-12
- Topic
- litigation
237 S.W.2d 193 (1951) In re ADOPTION OF SYPOLT. DUCKER et al. v. BROOKS et al. No. 42149. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Adoption of Sypolt. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
IN RE ADOPTION OF SYPOLT,361 Mo. 958(Mo. 1951)
237 S.W.2d 193
In Re: Adoption of JOHN McCORD SYPOLT, alias MACKEY SEGAL., alias JOHN
HORNER, a minor,
JOHN J. DUCKER and NAOMI E. DUCKER, Appellants, v. JOHN E. BROOKS and IDA
BROOKS, Gerald, Missouri, HELEN HUNDHAUSEN, Director, State Welfare
Office, Union, Missouri, JUDGE R.H. SCHAPER, Magistrate, Union, Franklin
County, Missouri, Respondents.
No. 42149.
Supreme Court of Missouri,
Division One.
March 12, 1951.
SUMMARY OF DECISION
Where a minor had been declared a neglected child in a magistrate court in Franklin County and was residing in Franklin County, the Juvenile Court of Greene County had no jurisdiction over a petition to adopt and a petition for the transfer of custody. A motion to quash both petitions was properly sustained.
HEADNOTES
1. PLEADING: Motion to Quash. The question of lack of jurisdiction over the person or subject matter may be raised by motion.2. ADOPTION OF CHILDREN: Venue: Child Residing in FranklinCounty: Juvenile Court of Greene County Without Jurisdiction. After obtaining the consent of the mother, plaintiffs, residents of Greene County, filed a petition in the Juvenile Court of Greene County for the adoption of a minor who had been declared a neglected child in a magistrate court in Franklin County and placed in the custody of persons in Franklin County. Plaintiffs also filed a petition for the transfer of the custody of the child to Greene County. The Juvenile Court of Greene County was without jurisdiction and properly quashed both proceedings. Plaintiffs must first file a petition in the Juvenile Court in Franklin County either for adoption or for transfer of the custody to them.
AFFIRMED.Page 959
(1) Who may adopt. Sec. 9608, R.S. 1939, as amended and reenacted Laws 1947, Vol. 2, p. 213, sec. 1. (2) Minor parent may consent to adoption of her child. Sec. 9609, R.S. 1939, as reenacted Laws 1947, Vol. 2, p. 213, sec. 1. (3) Circuit Court, Greene County, Missouri, Juvenile Division has jurisdiction to hear and determine the adoption petition in this case, without the consent of any party, except that of a parent. Hence, consent of neither the Magistrate Court of Franklin County, the State Welfare Agency, nor of John E. Brooks and Ida Brooks, was a condition precedent to the vesting of jurisdiction of the adoption proceedings in the Circuit Court of Greene County. Sec. 9610, R.S. 1939, reenacted Laws 1947, Vol. 2, p. 213, sec. 1.Joseph T. TateandHaymes Dickeyfor respondents.
(1) In the absence of a petition to and the approval of the Circuit Court, Juvenile Division, Franklin County, for the surrender and transfer of this child, the Greene County Juvenile Court had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the adoption sought, and so properly dismissed the adoption petition and refused to order such surrender and transfer. Sec. 9616, Laws 1947, Vol. II, p. 218; In re Duren,355 Mo. 1222,200 S.W.2d 343; In re Adoption of Siler,225 S.W.2d 379. (2) Before they can adopt this child the Greene County petitioners must have lawful and actual custody of it for at least nine months; and the Greene County Juvenile Court is wholly without power to give them that custody in this case. Sec. 9613. Laws 1947, Vol. II, p. 216; Sec. 9616, supra; State ex rel. v. Porterfield,211 Mo. App. 499,244 S.W. 966; sec. 9698, Laws 1945, p. 627. (3) The Magistrate Court, Juvenile Division, Franklin County, has jurisdiction over this child and its jurisdiction is paramount unless and until lawfully terminated. Mo. Constitution, Art. V, Sec. 20; Laws 1945, p. 771; Sec. 9698, Laws 1945, p. 627; Sec. 9704, R.S. 1939; State ex rel. Dew v. Trimble,306 Mo. 657,269 S.W. 617.
The allegations of the adoption petition are summarized in the opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals and need not be repeated here. In re Sypolt's Adoption, supra, l.c. 878. In both the petition to adopt and the petition to transfer the custody of the child to appellants, it is alleged that appellants are residents of Greene County, Missouri. The petition to transfer custody contains these allegations:
"2. That said minor child, John McCord Sypolt, alias Mackey Segal, alias John Horner, was found to be a neglected child on August 30, 1948, by the Magistrate Court, Juvenile Division, Franklin County, Missouri, and that said child was made a ward of said Court and placed with the State Division of Welfare, Franklin County, Missouri, for their attention and supervision and that said welfare office was ordered to place said child with John Brooks and Ida Brooks, his wife, of Gerald, Missouri, to care and provide for said child: that on October 29, 1948, the Magistrate Court, Juvenile Division, Franklin County, Missouri, at a subsequent hearing further ordered that the previous order of August 30, 1948, remain in full force and effect and that the custody and control continue in John Brooks and Ida Brooks under the supervision of the Franklin County Welfare Office; that on February 4, 1949, at a subsequent hearing the previous order of said court was to remain in full force and effect; and that said child is now in the temporary custody and control of John Brooks and Ida Brooks of Gerald, Missouri, under the supervision and attention of the State Division of Welfare, Franklin County, Missouri.
"3. WHEREFORE, your petitioners pray that this Honorable Court transfer the custody of John McCord Sypolt from John Brooks and Ida Brooks, his wife, of Gerald, Missouri, the State Division of Welfare, Franklin County, Missouri, and the mother of said child, Evelyn Sypolt Boston, to John J. Ducker and Naomi E. Ducker."
The petition to adopt contains similar allegations so that each petition shows upon its face that appellants do not have the legal orPage 961actual custody of the child and that the child is in the custody of others in Franklin County, Missouri.
[1] The motion to quash was evidently intended to be directed to both petitions, and we construe the order of the trial court sustaining such motion and dismissing the petition for adoption to be applicable also to the petition to transfer custody of the child. The motion to quash challenged the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court of Greene County "over the person of said minor" and charged "that there is no provision in the law for the removal of jurisdiction from said Magistrate Court, Juvenile Division,[195](of Franklin County) to the Circuit Court of Green County, Juvenile Division, Missouri, without the consent of the said Magistrate Court.
"WHEREFORE it is respectfully prayed that the Court quash the petition in the above entitled cause of action and that it be held for naught by reason of lack of jurisdiction." (Insert ours.) The question of lack of jurisdiction over the person or subject matter may be raised by motion. Sec.509.290, R.S. 1949.
[2] The written consent of the child's mother to his adoption by appellants was filed with the petition of adoption. Appellants argue in their brief that the Juvenile Court of Greene County has jurisdiction to act upon the petition of adoption without the consent of anyone except the child's mother and that "consent of neither the Magistrate Court of Franklin County, the State Welfare Agency, nor of John E. Brooks and Ida Brooks, was a condition precedent to the vesting of jurisdiction of the adoption proceedings in the Circuit Court of Greene County" citing what is now Sec.453.060, R.S. 1949.
The Springfield Court of Appeals held that there was nothing in Secs. 9608, 9609 or 9610, Laws 1947, Vol. II, p. 213 ff. (now Secs.453.010,453.040and453.060) "requiring the consent of the Juvenile Division of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, the Magistrate thereof, or of any of the other respondents named in the petition, before the Circuit Court of Greene County could act." In re Sypolt's Adoption, supra, l.c. 879, 880.
We assume that the proceeding brought in the Magistrate Court of Franklin County whereby said child was adjudged to be neglected, made a ward of that court, and ordered placed in the home of John E. Brooks and his wife, under the supervision of the State Division of Welfare for Franklin County, was conducted under the provisions of Secs. 9701-9704, R.S. 1939 (now Secs. 211.360-211.390). Upon our view of this case, we do not consider that it is necessary for us to examine the validity or propriety of that proceeding. In our opinion, the question presented by the motion to quash was whether the Juvenile Court of Greene County had jurisdiction to act upon the petition to transfer custody of the child to appellants, or more accuratelyPage 962whether venue of the petition to transfer custody was in such court. (See 12 Mo. Law Review, 310 — "Adoption of Children.")
This requires a consideration of the provisions of Sec.453.110in its relation to other provisions of the adoption statutes enacted by the Legislature in 1947. (Laws 1947, Vol. II, p. 213 — Chapter 453, R.S. 1949.) It has been held that the adoption statutes constitute a complete code and that the various sections thereof should be construed together. Rochford v. Bailey,322 Mo. 1155,17 S.W.2d 941, 944; In re McFarland,223 Mo. App. 826,12 S.W.2d 523, 525; In re Adoption of Siler (Mo. App.),225 S.W.2d 379, 381.
Sec.453.010provides that a petition for adoption may be filed in the Juvenile Court "of the county in which the person seeking to adopt resides, or in which the person sought to be adoptedmay be,* * *." (Italics supplied.) Sec.453.070provides that no decree for adoption shall be entered "nor shall transfer of custody of such a child to the petitioner * * * in such adoption petition be ordered by the juvenile court having jurisdiction," until after a full investigation of the child and of the petitioners has been made. Sec.453.080provides that a decree of adoption shall not be entered unless "the person sought to be adopted, if a minor, has been in thelawful and actual custodyof the petitioner * * * for a period of at least nine months prior to entry of the adoption decree, * * *." (Italics supplied.)
Sec.453.110prohibits the transfer of custody or the acceptance of the custody of a child by any person, agency, or organization without first having filed a petition before the Juvenile Court "of the county where the childmay be,* * *." (Italics supplied.) The language of this section fixing the venue of a petition for the transfer of the custody of a minor child is clear and unambiguous, and we have no[196]right to read into it an intent which is not indicated by the phraseology employed. State ex rel. Jacobsmeyer v. Thatcher,338 Mo. 622,92 S.W.2d 640; St. Louis Amusement Co. v. St. Louis County,347 Mo. 456,147 S.W.2d 667; State ex inf. Rice v. Hawk,360 Mo. 490,228 S.W.2d 785, 789. The county where the child "may be" undoubtedly means the county where the child is resident at the time. In re Duren.355 Mo. 1222,200 S.W.2d 343.
The petitions filed by appellants in the Juvenile Court of Greene County show that they do not have legal, or actual custody of the child and that such child resides in Franklin County. They asked the Juvenile Court of Greene County to transfer custody of the child to them. Clearly, the Juvenile Court of Greene County had no power to entertain such a petition and the sole power to enter such an order was vested in the Juvenile Court of Franklin County so long as the child resided in that County. It would be futile for appellants to pursue their petition for adoption in Greene County so long as thePage 963child continued to be in Franklin County and they did not have lawful custody of him. A final decree of adoption could not be entered until they had "lawful and actual" custody of the child for a period of at least nine months.
The appellants are not without remedy. They may file their petition for adoption in the Juvenile Court of Franklin County, where the child now is, and that court, in the exercise of its discretion, may properly enter an order transferring custody of the child to them. If they prefer to have the decree of adoption entered by the Juvenile Court of Greene County, where appellants reside, they may first petition the Juvenile Court of Franklin County for an order transferring custody of the child to them, and having thus obtained custody of the child, file their petition for adoption in the Juvenile Court of Greene County. Compare: State ex rel. Grimstead v. Mueller,361 Mo. 92,233 S.W.2d 700.
The action of the trial court in sustaining the motion to quash and in dismissing the petitions was proper, and it is hereby affirmed.Van OsdolandLozier, CC.,concur.