Opinion · Supreme Court of Minnesota

Scannell v. Metterhausen

Scannell v. Metterhausen, 134 Minn. 479 (Minn. 1916)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jurisdiction
Minnesota
Date
1916-11-10
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The only question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence supports the verdict. A reading of the record discloses such evidence, and we affirm the order appealed from without discussion thereof. No statutory costs will be allowed. Order affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Scannell v. Metterhausen. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence supports the verdict. A reading of the record discloses such evidence, and we affirm the order appealed from without discussion thereof. No statutory costs will be allowed.

Order affirmed.