Opinion · Supreme Court of Minnesota
Gorton v. Massey
Gorton v. Massey, 12 Minn. 145 (Minn. 1866)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Minnesota
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota
- Date
- 1866-07-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “A fraudulent conveyance, so far as creditors are concerned, can be avoided by them, only after they have obtained judgment”.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gorton v. Massey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
By the Cowt
McMillan, J".The defendant in error, the plaintiff below, is a simple contract creditor, and as such,
A fraudulent conveyance, so far as creditors are concerned, can be avoided by them, only after they have obtained judgment. The defendant in error, being a simple contract creditor merely, cannot in this action obtain the relief he seeks. He must first obtain his judgment at law, and then invoke the aid of a court of equity in his behalf. McCartney vs. Bostwick, et al., 31 Barb. Rep., 390; 1 Am. Lea. Cas., page 45, 4th ed; Hastings vs. Belknap, 1 Denio, 191, 198.
"We see nothing in the facts of this case, upon which the claim by the defendant in error, of a vendor’s lien upon the premises, can be sustained. As these views dispose of the present action, the further points in this case need not be considered.
The judgment below is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.