Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court
People v. Huston
485 Mich. 885
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Michigan Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
- Date
- 2009-09-28
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 28, 2009 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 138287 & (16) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Huston. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Cecil D. HUSTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. 138287. COA No. 288843.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 28, 2009.Order
On order of the Court, the motion to add issues is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration *419 as on leave granted of the challenge to the scoring of Offense Variable 10, MCL 777.40, in light of People v. Cannon, 481 Mich. 152, 749 N.W.2d 257 (2008). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.