Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court
Mayor of Detroit v. Governor of Michigan
482 Mich. 960
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Michigan Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
- Date
- 2008-09-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that a claim is not ripe “if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or may not occur at all”
- affirming the result only of the Court of Appeals judgment without further explanation
- CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and MARKMAN, JJ., concurring
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mayor of Detroit v. Governor of Michigan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 21 opinions
755 N.W.2d 153 (2008)
MAYOR OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Docket No. 137197. COA No. 287462.
MAYOR OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN and Detroit City Council, Defendants-Appellees.
Docket No. 137197. COA No. 287462.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 4, 2008.On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 2, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of proceedings is DENIED.