Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court
Arbuckle v. General Motors, LLC
Arbuckle v. Gen. Motors, LLC, 498 Mich. 956 (Mich. 2015)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Michigan Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
- Date
- 2015-12-23
- Topic
- general
“Because defendant has failed to sufficiently develop this argument or to provide any record citation in support of his claim, we find that the issue has been abandoned on appeal.” | “Because defendant has failed to sufficiently develop this argument or to provide any record citation in support of his claim, we find that the issue has been abandoned on appeal.” | “Because defendant has failed to sufficiently develop this argument or to provide any record citation in support of his claim, we find that the issue has been abandoned on appeal.” | “Because defendant has failed to sufficiently develop this argument or to provide any record citation in support of his claim, we find that the issue has been abandoned on appeal.” | “Because defendant has failed to sufficiently develop this argument or to provide any record citation in support of his claim, we find that the issue has been abandoned on appeal.” | citations and internal quotation marks omitted; alterations by the Bosca Court | stating the elements of assault with dangerous weapon
Citator
- Cited by
- 29 opinions
The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the plaintiff’s action is preempted by federal law, and (2) whether the plaintiffs action is governed by state law or federal law. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
The Eastern District of Michigan Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, the Labor and Employment Law Section of the Federal Bar Association, the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and the Workers’ Compensation Law and the Labor and Employment Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other