Opinion · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Boyd v. State
294 Md. 103
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Maryland
- Jurisdiction
- Maryland
- Date
- 1982-07-27
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- adopting the reasons given in the opinion of the Court of Special Appeals
- read as whole, IAD does not require unrelated indictments in different counties to be tried before returning defendant to District of Columbia correctional facility, where defendant brought to State under one indictment
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Boyd v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 18 opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari filed in this case by Harvey Franklin Boyd presented the following question: "Did the Court of Special Appeals err in holding that the dismissal requirement of Article 27, § 616 E (Article IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers) did not apply to the instant case because the instant indictment was not one contemplated by § 616 E (e)?”
The petition having been granted, the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Boyd v. State, 51 Md. App. 197, 441 A.2d 1133 (1982) is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of that Court.
Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed.
Costs to be paid by the petitioner.