Opinion · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Perkins v. Fairfield

11 Mass. 227

Type
Opinion
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts
Date
1814-05-15
Topic
real-estate

Per Curiam. The order of the Court of Common Pleas, under which the administrators made the sale in this case, was a license to them to make sale of all the real estate of their intestate. That court had jurisdiction of the subject matter. If that jurisdiction was improvidently exercised, or in a manner not warranted by the evidence from the Probate Court, yet it is not to be corrected at the expense of the purchaser, who had a right to rely upon the order of the court, as an authority emanating from a competent jurisdiction. It is too late to say that the neglect of requiring a bond from the administrators, to account for the proceeds of the sale, is fatal to a title derived from their authority, (a) Tenant defaulted.

Citator

Cited by
32 opinions
Per Curiam.

The order of the Court of Common Pleas, under which the administrators made the sale in this case, was a license to them to make sale of all the real estate of their intestate. That court had jurisdiction of the subject matter. If that jurisdiction was improvidently exercised, or in a manner not warranted by the evidence from the Probate Court, yet it is not to be corrected at the expense of the purchaser, who had a right to rely upon the order of the court, as an authority emanating from a competent jurisdiction. It is too late to say that the neglect of requiring a bond from the administrators, to account for the proceeds of the sale, is fatal to a title derived from their authority, (a)

Tenant defaulted.

Leverett vs. Harris, 7 Mass. Rep. 292. — Sed vide Thomson vs. Brown & Al. 16 Mass. Rep. 172.—Heath vs. Wells, 5 Pick. 140.