Opinion · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Commonwealth v. Wise
110 Mass. 181
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts
- Date
- 1872-10-15
- Topic
- general
Morton, J. Before the jury was empanelled, the defendant filed a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that it set forth no offence known to the law. We are of opinion that this motion should have been granted. The indictment alleges that the defendant on a day named, at Lancaster, “ unlawfully did keep and maintain a certain common, ill-governed and disorderly tenement there situate.” It was probably intended to charge the common law offence of keeping a disorderly house; but the word *182“ tenement,” though it includes a house or building, has a much more enlarged signification. It signifies land or any corporeal inheritance or anything of a permanent nature which may be holden. 3 Kent Com.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Wise. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Before the jury was empanelled, the defendant filed a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that it set forth no offence known to the law. We are of opinion that this motion should have been granted. The indictment alleges that the defendant on a day named, at Lancaster, “ unlawfully did keep and maintain a certain common, ill-governed and disorderly tenement there situate.” It was probably intended to charge the common law offence of keeping a disorderly house; but the word
M. J. McCafferty, for the defendant.
W. Gr. Colburn, Assistant Attorney General, ((7. It. Train, Attorney General, with him,) for the Commonwealth.