Opinion · Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Thomas
2009 La. LEXIS 3008
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Louisiana
- Jurisdiction
- Louisiana
- Date
- 2009-10-16
- Topic
- general
In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 6-98-834; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KW 1586. Writ granted. Although the district court retains the discretion to allow the amendment and supplementation of timely filed applications for post-conviction relief, see e.g.
Citator
- Cited by
- 34 opinions
In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 6-98-834; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KW 1586.
Writ granted. Although the district court retains the discretion to allow the amendment and supplementation of timely filed applications for post-conviction relief, see e.g. State ex rel. Foy v. Whitley, 92-1281 (La.10/6/95), 661 So.2d 455, relator’s claims that the court imposed an excessive sentence and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 and State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. Accordingly, the lower courts erred when they did not dismiss relator’s supplemental post-conviction application filed on June 25, 2007, as La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 “provides no basis for review of claims of excessiveness or other sentencing error post-conviction.” Melinie, supra.
WEIMER, J., recused. JOHNSON, J., would deny.