Opinion · Supreme Court of Louisiana
In re Yaeger
In re Yaeger, (La. 2002)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Louisiana
- Jurisdiction
- Louisiana
- Date
- 2002-04-10
- Topic
- general
ORDER Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent, Paul J. Yaeger, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for the institution of formal charges. Upon remand, the hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 10(a) and 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001. /s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Yaeger. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
ORDER
Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent, Paul J. Yaeger, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for the institution of formal charges. Upon remand, the hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 10(a) and 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001.
/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana