Opinion · Appellate Court of Illinois
Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad
186 Ill. App. 531
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Court of Illinois
- Jurisdiction
- Illinois
- Date
- 1914-05-01
- Topic
- estate-planning
Mr. Justice Harris delivered the opinion of the court. Abstract of the Decision. Attorney and client, § 134*—upon whom notice for attorney’s lien must he served. Section 55, ch. 83, Hurd’s R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
Mr. Justice Harris
delivered the opinion of the court.
Abstract of the Decision. Attorney and client, § 134*—upon whom notice for attorney’s lien must he served. Section 55, ch. 83, Hurd’s R. S. J. & A. ¶ 611, providing that notice for attorney’s lien shall be -served upon the party against whom the attorney’s client may have suit, means that the notice must be personally served on the party against whom summons would issue, and the personal service of such notice should follow the law as to service of process where the party is a corporation.