Opinion · Illinois Supreme Court
Chultem v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.
Chultem v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., No. Docket No. 120448, UP7080687 (Ill. May 18, 2017)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Illinois Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Illinois
- Date
- 2017-05-18
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “The key point of Glasper . . . is unremarkable: A Rule 431(b) violation does not necessarily result in a biased jury.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Chultem v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 121 opinions
¶ 1 In this case, one Justice of this court has recused himself, and the remaining members of the court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3 ). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank of Chicago , 60 Ill.2d 529, 530, 331 N.E.2d 65 (1975).
¶ 2 THOMAS, J., took no part.