Opinion · Supreme Court of Georgia

Sybron Corporation v. Anderson

251 Ga. 593

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Date
1983-11-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • allowing a claim for cataracts after plaintiffs had experienced other illnesses resulting from exposure to an industrial chemical on the theory of a continuing tort
  • claim for cataracts allowed after plaintiff experienced other illnesses caused by exposure to same gas, upon theory of a continuing tort
  • claim for cataracts allowed after plaintiff experienced other illnesses as result of exposure to same toxic gas, under theory of continuing tort

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sybron Corporation v. Anderson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
14 opinions
Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, we find that the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the judgment rendered thereon, Anderson v. Sybron Corp., 165 Ga. App. 566 (299 SE2d 160) (1983), are correct and should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., who dissents.