Opinion · District Court of Appeal of Florida
Cikora v. State
Cikora v. State, No. Nos. 83-1341, 83-1357, UP7533997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May 30, 1984)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Date
- 1984-05-30
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cikora v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.
Affirmed.
GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.