Opinion · Supreme Court of Florida

Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co.

Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co., 51 Fla. 255 (Fla. 1906)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1906-01-15
Topic: general

Per Curiam. In these causes the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice COCKRELL and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD are of opinion that the judgment should be reversed, while Mr. Justice TAYLOR, Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

Per Curiam.

In these causes the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice COCKRELL and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD are of opinion that the judgment should be reversed, while Mr. Justice TAYLOR, Mr. Justice HOOKER and Mr. Justice PARKHILL are of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of the State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla, 224, *256 37 South. Rep. 51; Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. 250, 37 South. Rep. 742, and Holton v. Patterson, 49 Fla. 178, 38 South. Rep. 352, a judgment will be entered in each of the above styled cause affirming the judgments to which the writs of error were taken. It is so ordered.