Opinion · Supreme Court of Florida

Aron v. Huttoe

Aron v. Huttoe, No. 42201, UP7450494 (Fla. July 26, 1972)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
1972-07-26
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 258 So.2d 272. The District Court has certified its decision as one passing on a question of great public interest, to-wit: “Whether a person who fails to appear at trial after having been properly subpoenaed may be brought into court during the -trial and summarily held in contempt after failing to prove an adequate excuse.” After argument and upon consideration of the record and briefs, we hold that the District Court of Appeal has correctly decided the cause and its decision is adopted as the ruling of this Court. Accordingly, certiorari is discharged. It is so ordered.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Aron v. Huttoe. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
14 opinions
PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 258 So.2d 272. The District Court has certified its decision as one passing on a question of great public interest, to-wit:

“Whether a person who fails to appear at trial after having been properly subpoenaed may be brought into court during the -trial and summarily held in contempt after failing to prove an adequate excuse.”

After argument and upon consideration of the record and briefs, we hold that the District Court of Appeal has correctly decided the cause and its decision is adopted as the ruling of this Court.

Accordingly, certiorari is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., and SMITH (HAROLD S.), Circuit Judge, concur.