Opinion · Supreme Court of Delaware

Scottoline v. Women First, LLC

Scottoline v. Women First, LLC, No. 18, 2024, UP9941580 (Del. Feb. 16, 2024)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Delaware
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Date: 2024-02-16
Topic: estate-planning

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LAUREN E. SCOTTOLINE, § Individually, and as Parent and § Guardian of J.S.S., a Minor, and § No. 18, 2024 STEPHEN SCOTTOLINE, Parent of § J.S.S., a Minor, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § C.A. No. N19C-08-135 § v. § § WOMEN FIRST, LLC, and § CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH § SYSTEM, INC., § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. § § Submitted: January 16, 2024 Decided: February 16, 2024 Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and GRIFFITHS, Justices. ORDER Upon consideration of the interlocutory appeal filed in No. 18, 2024 from the Superior Court’s March 1, 2023 and December 15, 2023 orders granting motions in limine and the appeal filed in No. 48, 2024 from the Superior Court’s January 31, 2024 order granting summary judgment, the interlocutory appeal is refused.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Scottoline v. Women First, LLC. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LAUREN E. SCOTTOLINE,                   §
Individually, and as Parent and         §
Guardian of J.S.S., a Minor, and        § No. 18, 2024
STEPHEN SCOTTOLINE, Parent of           §
J.S.S., a Minor,                        § Court Below—Superior Court
                                        § of the State of Delaware
       Plaintiffs Below,                §
       Appellants,                      § C.A. No. N19C-08-135
                                        §
       v.                               §
                                        §
WOMEN FIRST, LLC, and                   §
CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH                  §
SYSTEM, INC.,                           §
                                        §
       Defendants Below,                §
       Appellees.                       §
                                        §

                           Submitted: January 16, 2024
                           Decided:   February 16, 2024

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

                                    ORDER

      Upon consideration of the interlocutory appeal filed in No. 18, 2024 from the

Superior Court’s March 1, 2023 and December 15, 2023 orders granting motions in

limine and the appeal filed in No. 48, 2024 from the Superior Court’s January 31,

2024 order granting summary judgment, the interlocutory appeal is refused. The

interlocutory appeal is unnecessary because the appellants can make arguments

concerning the March 1, 2023 and December 15, 2023 orders in their appeal of the
Superior Court’s January 31, 2024 order granting summary judgment in No. 48,

2024.

        NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is

REFUSED.

                                         BY THE COURT:

                                         /s/ N. Christopher Griffiths
                                         Justice




                                     2