Opinion · Supreme Court of Delaware
F. I. Du Pont, Glore Forgan & Co. v. Silliman
310 A.2d 128
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
- Jurisdiction
- Delaware
- Date
- 1973-09-06
- Topic
- general
F. I. Du PONT, GLORE FORGAN & COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Mariana Du Pont SILLIMAN, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, Edmund Du Pont, Defendant. Supreme Court of Delaware.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed F. I. Du Pont, Glore Forgan & Co. v. Silliman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
F. I. Du PONT, GLORE FORGAN & COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Mariana Du Pont SILLIMAN, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, Edmund Du Pont, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sept. 6, 1973.
Januar D. Bove, Jr. and Arthur G. Connolly, Jr., of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, and Peter Gruenberger, James W. Quinn and Robert Weiner of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, for defendant below, appellant.
Henry N. Herndon, Jr. and Edward M. McNally, of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellee.
Before HERRMANN,- C. J., and CAREY and DUFFY, JJ.
For the reasons stated in the careful opinion below (Del.Super., 302 A.2d 327), we agree that the plaintiff may maintain this action against F. I. duPont, Glore For-gan & Company, a limited partnership, in its common name as a partnership entity, without joinder of individual partners.
It is to be noted that any doubt as to the meaning of 10 Del.C. § 3904 in this regard has now been removed by the July 1, 1973 amendment thereto, - Del.L.Ch. -.*
The judgment below is affirmed.