Opinion · Supreme Court of Delaware
Barrow v. State
913 A.2d 569
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
- Jurisdiction
- Delaware
- Date
- 2006-12-11
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding the claim that counsel were ineffective for failing to timely file a motion to suppress was barred by Rule 61(i)(4) because the court already found that admitting the statement did not prejudice the defendant
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Barrow v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
913 A.2d 569 (2006)
BARROW
No. 74, 2006.
BARROW
v.
STATE.
No. 74, 2006.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
December 11, 2006.Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.