Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta
Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta, 247 Conn. 905 (Conn. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1998-09-15
- Topic
- bankruptcy
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 203 (AC 16509), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court that it lacked jurisdiction to order rescission of the stipulated agreement between the parties?” BERDON and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 203 (AC 16509), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court that it lacked jurisdiction to order rescission of the stipulated agreement between the parties?”
BERDON and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.