Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Thomas
State v. Thomas, 247 Conn. 935 (Conn. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1998-11-03
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 369 (AC 15740), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly terminate its review of the defendant’s Batson claim after concluding that some of the state’s reasons for exercising its peremptory challenge against an African-American venireperson were legitimate?” KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Ellen A.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Thomas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 369 (AC 15740), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly terminate its review of the defendant’s Batson claim after concluding that some of the state’s reasons for exercising its peremptory challenge against an African-American venireperson were legitimate?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Ellen A. Jawitz, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 3, 1998