Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Slater
State v. Slater, 280 Conn. 950 (Conn. 2006)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2006-12-15
- Topic
- international-arbitration
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 288 (AC 26356), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim’s statements to civilian bystanders were not testimonial under the confrontation clause? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim’s statements to medical personnel were not testimonial under the confrontation clause? “3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the failure to give an instruction on the jailhouse informant was harmless?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Slater. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 288 (AC 26356), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim’s statements to civilian bystanders were not testimonial under the confrontation clause?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim’s statements to medical personnel were not testimonial under the confrontation clause?
“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the failure to give an instruction on the jailhouse informant was harmless?”