Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Robinson
286 Conn. 902
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2008-02-26
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 179 (AC 27282), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state had probable cause to arrest the defendant for criminal trespass in violation of General Statutes § 53a-109 (a) (1) even though no sign prohibiting entry was posted on the premises where the defendant was apprehended and there was a gateless opening in the front concrete wall of those premises?” *903 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18115. Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Robinson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 179 (AC 27282), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state had probable cause to arrest the defendant for criminal trespass in violation of General Statutes § 53a-109 (a) (1) even though no sign prohibiting entry was posted on the premises where the defendant was apprehended and there was a gateless opening in the front concrete wall of those premises?”
*903 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18115. Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 26, 2008ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.