Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Provost
247 Conn. 914
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1998-09-29
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 56 (AC 15651) is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the trial court improperly preclude the cross-examination of a prosecution witness? “2. Was the state’s attorney’s closing argument improper and is it reviewable under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Provost. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 56 (AC 15651) is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the trial court improperly preclude the cross-examination of a prosecution witness?
“2. Was the state’s attorney’s closing argument improper and is it reviewable under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?”