Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Mikolinski
State v. Mikolinski, 252 Conn. 949 (Conn. 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2000-03-22
- Topic
- intellectual-property-and-technology
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 252 (AC 17866), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s detention at a roadside sobriety checkpoint did not violate her rights under either article first, § 7, or article first, § 9, of the Connecticut constitution?” SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Mikolinski. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 252 (AC 17866), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s detention at a roadside sobriety checkpoint did not violate her rights under either article first, § 7, or article first, § 9, of the Connecticut constitution?”
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.