Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Jacobson

273 Conn. 928

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2005-04-21
Topic
general

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 440 (AC 23983), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the improper introduction of fifty-three photographs, testimony regarding a ziplock bag of hair and testimony regarding the defendant’s prior misconduct constituted harmless error?” *929The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17415. Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition. Frederick W.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Jacobson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 440 (AC 23983), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the improper introduction of fifty-three photographs, testimony regarding a ziplock bag of hair and testimony regarding the defendant’s prior misconduct constituted harmless error?”

*929 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17415. Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition. Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided April 21, 2005