Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Green

State v. Green, 256 Conn. 927 (Conn. 2001)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2001-06-14
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

granting certification on issue of whether Appellate Court properly concluded that trial court’s instruction “was proper”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Green. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 217 (AC 18369), is granted, limited to the following issues:

*928 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16544. KentDrager, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Denise B. Smoker, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 14, 2001

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s instruction, limiting the jury’s use of the evidence regarding the effect of Leroy Townsend’s use of marijuana on his credibility, was proper?

“2. If the answer to question one is ‘no,’ was the error harmless?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.