Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Gibson
263 Conn. 906
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2003-03-25
- Topic
- general
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 103 (AC 21779), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the convictions on the third and fourth counts must be set aside on the grounds of constitutional error in the court’s jury instructions?” Joseph G. Bruckmann, public defender, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2003
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Gibson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 103 (AC 21779), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the convictions on the third and fourth counts must be set aside on the grounds of constitutional error in the court’s jury instructions?”
Joseph G. Bruckmann, public defender, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2003