Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Cole
State v. Cole, 247 Conn. 937 (Conn. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1998-11-03
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 312 (AC 17617), is granted, limited to the following issue: *938The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16039. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Cole. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 312 (AC 17617), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the trial court’s failure to define the term ‘wrongfulness’ under General Statutes § 53a-13 (a) was not improper?”
BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.