Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Aponte
247 Conn. 926
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1998-10-22
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 114 (AC 15002), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the prosecutor did not result in a denial of due process? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s testimony?” Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Aponte. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 114 (AC 15002), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the prosecutor did not result in a denial of due process?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s testimony?”
Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998