Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Anderson

251 Conn. 926

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1999-11-30
Topic
general

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 60 (AC 17456), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the juror misconduct involved in this case (1) required it to exercise its supervisory authority so as to order a new trial, and (2) was a structural defect that required a new trial without an inquiry into its harmlessness?”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Anderson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 60 (AC 17456), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the juror misconduct involved in this case (1) required it to exercise its supervisory authority so as to order a new trial, and (2) was a structural defect that required a new trial without an inquiry into its harmlessness?”