Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Amado
State v. Amado, 247 Conn. 953 (Conn. 1999)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1999-01-04
- Topic
- litigation
The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 607 (AC 15176), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to prevail under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), on the trial court’s instructions regarding General Statutes § 53a-20, concerning the use of force in defense of premises? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to prevail under State v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Amado. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 607 (AC 15176), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to prevail under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), on the trial court’s instructions regarding General Statutes § 53a-20, concerning the use of force in defense of premises?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to prevail under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), on the trial court’s instructions regarding the duty to retreat?
“3. If the answer to question one or two is yes, was either such improper instruction harmless in view of