Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sokaitis v. Bakaysa
Sokaitis v. Bakaysa, 286 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2008)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2008-03-25
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 663 (AC 28099), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the parties’ contract was not unenforceable under General Statutes § 52-553?” VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. *914 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18130. William J. Sweeney, Jr., in support of the petition. Sean R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sokaitis v. Bakaysa. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 663 (AC 28099), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the parties’ contract was not unenforceable under General Statutes § 52-553?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
*914 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18130. William J. Sweeney, Jr., in support of the petition. Sean R. Higgins, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2008